The global tax juggernaut

The recent G20 meeting took place in Brazil, bringing together the heads of state and government from the world’s 20 leading economies. In a pompous and undeserved manner, the final declaration – the only official outcome of these extremely expensive meetings – begins with, “We, the Leaders.”

These so-called “leaders,” whether democratic, authoritarian, Marxist or nationalist, share little in common except for one goal: consolidating their own power, increasing control over citizens and introducing regulations, many of which infringe on individual freedom and privacy.

While paying lip service to climate change, they agreed to tax the rich and proposed global measures to enforce this.

In highly developed countries, tax revenues are already abundant. Citizens and businesses are taxed to the last penny, yet governments remain unsatisfied. Public debt continues to rise.

The relentless administrative pursuit of taxes has four major flaws. First, tax systems are so complex that they allow authorities to make arbitrary decisions. Second, they create significant challenges for businesses. Third, they impose heavy burdens on everyone. Finally, the cost-benefit calculation at the national economic level is disastrous.

The debt crisis in many countries is not a revenue problem; it is an expense problem. Irresponsible policies, arrogance, ideological agendas and populism have led to enormous waste by governments worldwide.

The insatiable tax monster disregards these realities, tightening the financial screws on citizens and businesses while public debt still grows. Instead of adopting more economically friendly practices, these leaders revive the politics of envy with calls to tax the rich.

 

Governments do not suffer from a lack of tax revenue. They suffer from excessive expenses and irresponsible waste.

 

This approach ignores empirical evidence. Individuals, including billionaires, generally manage their finances more carefully and beneficially than public administrations do. Taxes are necessary and legitimate but should fund essential common interests – not allow governments to disproportionately expand their power and influence. Taxation should not become an instrument of excessive, populist and harmful redistribution, which often fails to reach individuals in need and instead vanishes into bloated bureaucracies.

To reiterate: Governments do not suffer from a lack of tax revenue. They suffer from excessive expenses and irresponsible waste.

Irresponsible leadership

How is this allowed? Parliaments are supposed to control budgets and ensure taxpayer funds are used responsibly. However, many parliamentarians rely on their political parties for their careers and often lack the skills to scrutinize fiscal policies effectively. This dereliction of duty represents a breach of fiduciary responsibility to citizens.

The U.S. has a theoretically effective tool in its “government shutdown” mechanism, which activates if spending exceeds certain limits. Unfortunately, it has degenerated into a bargaining chip in political disputes between the White House and Congress.

Some European countries, such as Germany and Switzerland, have implemented “debt brakes.” However, in Berlin, this safeguard is irresponsibly circumvented through the creation of so-called “special assets,” which are simply off-the-books debts.

Finance ministers in industrialized countries are often drawn from the political, administrative, or academic elite. They belong to the public sector and are paid by taxpayers. A refreshing change comes with the recent nomination of businessman Scott Bessent as U.S. Treasurer, who will hopefully bring a long-overdue perspective.

This comment was originally published here: https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/tax-juggernaut/

Our Partners

Liechtenstein Academy | private, educational foundation (FL)
Altas Network | economic research foundation (USA)
Austrian Economics Center | Promoting a free, responsible and prosperous society (Austria)
Berlin Manhatten Institute | non-profit Think Tank (Germany)
Buchausgabe.de | Buecher fuer den Liberalismus (Germany)
Cato Institute | policy research foundation (USA)
Center for the New Europe | research foundation (Belgium)
Forum Ordnungspolitik
Friedrich Naumann Stiftung
George Mason University
Heartland Institute
Hayek Institut
Hoover Institution
Istituto Bruno Leoni
IEA
Institut Václava Klause
Instytut Misesa
IREF | Institute of Economical and Fiscal Research
Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise | an interdivisional Institute between the Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, and the Whiting School of Engineering
Liberales Institut
Liberty Fund
Ludwig von Mises Institute
LUISS
New York University | Dept. of Economics (USA)
Stockholm Network
Students for Liberty
Swiss Mises Institute
Universidad Francisco Marroquin
Walter-Eucken-Institut