Is Europe ready to defend its interests?

As Europe navigates a complex landscape of internal and external pressures, an urgent question emerges: Are European nations prepared to defend their interests? Many countries in the continent are experiencing conflicting emotions regarding internal security, caught between despair and resignation. Key factors contributing to this unease include the influx of non-European immigrants and the lax law enforcement of criminal activities within these communities due to pressure from woke and leftist movements in intellectual and political circles.

However, a shift in mindset is underway. New political groups, long dismissed as right-wing, radical and populist, are gaining prominence in politics and public discourse. The ineffective policies of the past two decades, often characterized as overly idealistic or “feel-good,” may soon be replaced by more pragmatic and realistic approaches.

While internal security remains a critical concern, Europe also grapples with significant external threats to its safety and freedom. Unfortunately, many European nations are ill-equipped to safeguard their interests. Essential investments in defense, human resources and civil protection have been overlooked. Instead, funds have been redirected to expanding technocratic structures, buying votes through generous welfare programs and squandering money on ideological endeavors. Ideas such as feminine foreign policies highlight a ridiculous waste.

Additionally, polls indicate a dangerously low willingness among Europeans to defend their countries. This situation is particularly concerning given the various external pressures Europe faces, including military threats, terrorism, border violations and disruptions in supply chains. A recent poll showed that only 32 percent of EU citizens would be willing to defend their country in the event of war. In countries like Germany, Austria, the Netherlands and Belgium, fewer than 20 percent of their citizens were willing to participate in defense efforts; this figure falls below the 30 percent mark in many Southern European nations and France.

 

Unfortunately, many European nations are ill-equipped to safeguard their interests. Essential investments in defense, human resources and civil protection have been overlooked.

 

Amid these domestic challenges, imminent threats and ongoing conflicts from the east call for a comprehensive strategy that includes actions in the south of the continent and globally to secure supply chains and trade routes. We must remember that foreign policy is interest policy and require a supportive defensive stance – ideally, one that is proactive.

The repercussions of neglecting internal security have become evident. Pressure from both the east and south, coupled with precarious situations in the regions south of Europe (such as Africa and the Middle East) and along supply lines, has now begun to change the political debate, although tangible actions are still lacking.

Even with the most advanced equipment, defense only acts as a credible deterrent when paired with a populace ready to stand and fight. The attitudes shaped by reckless welfare state policies do not bode well for Europe’s future. A strong defense is crucial to avoid victimhood and should cultivate a mindset that values and honors heroes.

Geographically, central and northern European countries are more concerned about threats from Russia, while southern and southwestern nations face pressure from Africa. It’s crucial to take both of these threats seriously and implement the necessary defense and deterrence measures. Furthermore, Europe must work towards gaining control over the security of its supply chains, such as the Suez Canal.

Despite political leaders acknowledging the need for higher defense spending, tangible progress in planning, coordination and execution has been minimal. The appointment of a defense commissioner in Brussels is not likely to lead to significant change.

 

Even with the most advanced equipment, defense only acts as a credible deterrent when paired with a populace ready to stand and fight.

 

The situation may seem grim, but there is a sense of change in the air. Russia’s attack on Ukraine and its ongoing threats have certainly been felt across the region. However, United States President Donald Trump’s straightforward reminder to European leaders about their responsibilities and obligations for defense truly served as the wake-up call European capitals needed.

Scandinavian countries, along with Finland and Eastern European nations such as Poland, are highly aware of the challenges they face at the governmental and societal levels and are actively striving to enhance their resilience.

Change is also evident among segments of the German population, though not within its stagnant government. Polls indicate that a majority now supports conscription, and a government shift is imminent. A new administration will likely cultivate closer ties with Poland, which could lead to significant developments. Together, Poland and Germany would create a combined population just shy of Russia’s, accompanied by a far greater economic and industrial capacity. Additionally, there may be opportunities for cooperation among France, Italy and Spain regarding interests in the south.

Ideally, this would foster close collaboration to safeguard the continent’s interests through a “European NATO.” This framework would operate independently from the European Union and include key nations such as Turkey and the United Kingdom. There is hope for a resilient European defense.

 

This comment was originally published here: https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/europes-defense-readiness/

Our Partners

Liechtenstein Academy | private, educational foundation (FL)
Altas Network | economic research foundation (USA)
Austrian Economics Center | Promoting a free, responsible and prosperous society (Austria)
Berlin Manhatten Institute | non-profit Think Tank (Germany)
Buchausgabe.de | Buecher fuer den Liberalismus (Germany)
Cato Institute | policy research foundation (USA)
Center for the New Europe | research foundation (Belgium)
Forum Ordnungspolitik
Friedrich Naumann Stiftung
George Mason University
Heartland Institute
Hayek Institut
Hoover Institution
Istituto Bruno Leoni
IEA
Institut Václava Klause
Instytut Misesa
IREF | Institute of Economical and Fiscal Research
Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise | an interdivisional Institute between the Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, and the Whiting School of Engineering
Liberales Institut
Liberty Fund
Ludwig von Mises Institute
LUISS
New York University | Dept. of Economics (USA)
Stockholm Network
Students for Liberty
Swiss Mises Institute
Universidad Francisco Marroquin
Walter-Eucken-Institut